Reportify
← All articles
Holistic Assessment9 June 2026· 9 Min Read· Updated 9 June 2026

What Parents Actually Want to See on a School Report Card in 2026

NEP 2020 and PARAKH have changed what a school report card must show. Here's what Indian parents actually look for — and how principals can design a card they'll use.

T
Reportify Editorial Team
Indian school principal reviewing a holistic progress card report format aligned with NEP 2020

What Parents Want in School Report Card in 2026

Every term, millions of Indian parents open a report card and ask roughly three questions: Is my child doing okay? Are they learning what actually matters? And what should we do at home? Most school report cards answer only the first question, partially, and in the language of percentages and ranks.

That is now a structural problem. NEP 2020 and NCF 2023 have shifted the national expectation: assessment must capture a student's cognitive, socio-emotional, physical, and creative growth — not just exam performance. PARAKH, NCERT's assessment body, has already released Holistic Progress Card (HPC) templates for the foundational, preparatory, and middle stages. By 2026, parents in many schools will see a fundamentally different document.

This post is written for school principals who are either redesigning their report card or trying to explain the new format to parents who are used to rank lists. By the end, you will know what parents in Indian schools actually look for when they open a report card, what the HPC framework requires, and how to present holistic data — including co-curricular development — in a way parents can read and act on.


Why 2026 Is a Turning Point for the School Report Card in India

The shift has been building since 2020, but 2026 is the year principals feel it on the ground. NEP 2020 called for a move away from "rote learning and high-stakes examinations" towards "360-degree holistic development." NCF 2023 operationalised that vision into stage-wise curriculum and assessment frameworks that explicitly require multi-domain reporting. PARAKH was set up under NCERT to develop assessment norms and HPC templates — and those templates are already in use across states for Classes 1 through 8.

The implication for a school principal: parents are beginning to arrive at PTMs having seen or heard about HPC formats. If your report card still shows only subject marks, attendance, and a generic teacher remark, parents are not going to assume the card is wrong — they are going to assume your school is behind.

The good news is that most schools already collect the data needed for a richer report card. The challenge is organising and presenting it in a way that informs rather than overwhelms.


What Indian Parents Actually Look For When They Open a Report Card

This is worth being specific about, because "what parents want" is not one thing.

Based on research into parent communication in Indian and global school contexts, parents typically scan a report card with three implicit questions in mind:

  1. Is my child safe and emotionally okay at school? Safety and belonging come before academics for most parents — particularly mothers, and particularly in younger grades. A report card that says nothing about social behaviour or wellbeing leaves this question unanswered.

  2. Are they progressing in the things that matter? Marks matter, but so does literacy in real tasks. ASER 2023 "Beyond Basics" found that only around 43% of rural youth aged 14–18 can correctly solve a basic division problem despite years of schooling. Parents are often unaware of this gap because marks and grades don't reveal whether a child is meeting grade-level competencies. A report card that shows a "B" in Mathematics tells parents almost nothing about what their child can actually do.

  3. What should we do at home? This is the most common unmet need in Indian report cards. Parents want guidance, not just data. Concrete next steps — "Spend 10 minutes daily on reading aloud" or "Encourage Priya to take on a team role in any activity" — convert a passive report into a useful conversation.

Parents in India also consistently emphasise safety, values, socio-emotional security, and all-round development as priorities when they evaluate a school. A report card that covers only subject marks sends a signal that the school is measuring what is easy to measure, not what actually matters to families.


From Marksheets to Holistic Progress Cards: What Must Change on the Page?

The structural differences between a traditional marksheet and a PARAKH-aligned HPC are significant.

Feature

Traditional marksheet

PARAKH-aligned HPC

Academic data

Marks/percentage per subject

Competency-level descriptors + marks

Non-academic growth

Absent or generic remark

Socio-emotional, physical, creative domains

Feedback sources

Teacher only

Teacher + peer + self + parent

Language

Marks and grades

Descriptors in plain language

Next steps for parents

None

Specific home-support guidance

Co-curricular evidence

At most a list of activities

Skills demonstrated, not just participation

The HPC for the middle stage (Classes 6–8), published by PARAKH/NCERT, explicitly asks schools to capture interpersonal skills, self-reflection, creativity, emotional skills, physical fitness, and participation in arts and sports — with multi-source feedback built into the structure.

This is not a minor formatting change. It requires a different approach to teacher training, data collection, and parent communication — and it requires the school to decide which information goes on the front of the card and which goes in supporting pages or a QR-linked portfolio.


Five Non-Negotiables: What Parents Should See on Every 2026 Report Card

Whether your school is using a PARAKH-template-aligned HPC or adapting your existing format, five elements are non-negotiable for a report card that genuinely serves parents in 2026.

1. Academic level vs grade-level expectations — not just marks. A score of 68% tells a parent almost nothing about whether their child is where they should be. The card must show whether the child is meeting, approaching, or exceeding grade-level learning outcomes per subject.

2. A brief summary of conceptual understanding. Two or three subject-level statements — "Aarav can apply fractions to word problems but needs support with algebraic reasoning" — are more useful than any percentage. NCF 2023 assessment guidelines are explicit: report cards should communicate competencies, not just topic coverage.

3. A holistic profile across key skills and behaviours. This is where most schools still fall short. NEP 2020 identifies cognitive, socio-emotional, physical, artistic, and ethical development as equally valid educational domains. The report card must have a visible section — not a footnote — that shows growth in areas like Communication, Teamwork, Self-Discipline, or Empathy.

4. Co-curricular participation with skill evidence, not a bare list. Listing "participated in Debate Club" tells parents nothing. What skills did participation build? To what level? Reportify's CSD framework maps 619 co-curricular events across 6 categories and 68 sub-categories to 12 skill domains — so that a child's participation in a science fair or a cultural event translates into a visible skill score, not a bullet point.

5. Two to three concrete next steps for home support. This is the element parents most often say is missing. Each section of the report card — academic and co-curricular — should close with one specific, actionable suggestion that a parent can actually follow at home.


Making Co-Curricular and Life Skills Visible Without Confusing Parents

The biggest design failure in "holistic" report cards is trying to report everything. Schools produce five-page rubrics for each domain, parents stop reading at page two, and the PTM conversation collapses back to "what is the percentage."

The principle here is: summarise at the top, detail below.

The first page of the co-curricular section should show, for each student, three things: the skill areas engaged (e.g., Leadership, Communication, Teamwork), a simple aggregate score or descriptor (e.g., Emerging / Developing / Proficient), and one highlight — a specific event or evidence point that parents can connect to their child's experience.

Detailed rubrics, event logs, and multi-source feedback can sit in supporting pages or behind a QR code for parents who want depth. On the phone — and ASER 2023 data shows that nearly 90% of Indian youth aged 14–18 now live in homes with smartphones — parents need the snapshot first.

Reportify's Holistic Score architecture does exactly this: an Academic Score (0–5) and a Co-curricular Skill Development (CSD) Score (0–5) combine into a single 0–10 Holistic Score that a parent can read in seconds, with the full methodology available via the CSD framework page for those who want to dig in. The five scoring dimensions — Skill Relevance, Participation Volume, Achievement, Temporal Consistency, and Competition Intensity — are designed so that a student who participates in 5–6 diverse intra-school events across different categories can achieve a CSD Score of 4.5 or above. That is a significant equity design choice: schools without access to national-level competitions can still demonstrate credible holistic development for their students.


How to Write Report Card Comments Parents Actually Read

Generic comments are the single most complained-about element of Indian school report cards, and they waste space that could carry real value.

There is a simple test for any report card comment: can the parent do something with it? If not, revise it.

Weak: "Shreya is a good student and has shown progress this term."

Stronger: "Shreya's essay writing has improved — her arguments are clearer. She benefits from reading one article per week on topics outside the curriculum to broaden her reference bank."

The pattern for effective comments is: specific observation + evidence (one example) + one actionable next step. That's it. The language should be jargon-free, warm but direct, and avoid phrases that hedge so much they say nothing ("could benefit from further development in areas of...").

One practical suggestion: train teachers to write comments in three sentences maximum. Longer is not more informative — it signals that the teacher does not know what to prioritise.


Designing the Report Card for a Smartphone Screen First

The default assumption that parents read report cards at a desk, on paper, with time to think is no longer accurate for most Indian schools. ASER 2023 shows that about 74% of Indian households had smartphones by 2022, up from 36% in 2018, and nearly 92% of youth aged 14–18 live in homes with a smartphone and can use one.

That means most parents will first open a digital report card on a phone, probably while commuting or between tasks. What they see in the first scroll determines whether they engage with the rest of the document.

Design implications for principals:

  • The first screen should show: student name, term, Holistic Score or overall descriptor, three key strengths, and two focus areas. Everything else can be below the fold or behind a tab.

  • Font size must be readable without zooming. Long tables with narrow columns fail on 6-inch screens.

  • QR codes or links can open detailed rubrics and event logs for parents who want them — but the default view should be the summary.

  • Provide a print-optimised version as well. Digital-first does not mean digital-only, particularly in semi-urban and rural contexts where shared devices and limited data are still realities.


How Reportify's Holistic Score Helps Schools Show 'Whole Child' Growth

Reportify is a holistic student development platform incubated at the IIM Lucknow Enterprise Incubation Centre. The platform was built around a specific problem: India's schools collect enormous amounts of co-curricular data, but that data does not appear on report cards in a way parents can understand or act on.

The solution is a structured scoring architecture — Academic Score (0–5) + CSD Score (0–5) = Holistic Score (0–10) — that is grounded in NEP 2020 and NCF 2023 frameworks. The CSD Score is not a participation trophy. It is calculated across five dimensions: Skill Relevance (does the event develop assessed skills?), Participation Volume, Achievement level, Temporal Consistency (sustained engagement over time), and Competition Intensity (the relative difficulty of the event). Twelve skill domains are tracked: Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication, Teamwork, Problem Solving, Leadership, Social Skills, Motor Skills, Self-Discipline, Empathy, Cultural Awareness, and Citizenship.

The equity dimension matters for principals in non-metro contexts: schools without access to national-level tournaments or state-level competitions can still generate meaningful CSD Scores if students participate consistently in diverse intra-school events. The framework is calibrated so that a student engaging in 5–6 well-categorised intra-school events across different categories can reach a CSD Score of 4.5+.

You can try the free Skill Analyser to simulate a student's CSD Score based on actual events from your school — it takes about five minutes and gives you a concrete sense of how the Holistic Score would change with different activity profiles.


A Practical Checklist: How Principals Can Redesign Their Report Card for 2026

If you are planning to overhaul your report card for the next academic year, this sequence reduces the risk of a rollout that confuses parents or exhausts teachers:

  1. Audit your current card against PARAKH's HPC template for your relevant stage (foundational, preparatory, middle). Identify what is missing and what can be retained.

  2. Run a short parent focus group — six to eight parents, mixed backgrounds — and ask: "What three things do you always look for first? What do you find confusing or useless?" Their answers will reshape your front page.

  3. Pilot the new format in one section or one grade before school-wide rollout. Catch design problems before they reach 1,200 families.

  4. Train teachers on two things only: (a) how to write three-sentence comments that include a specific next step, and (b) how to map co-curricular participation to skill descriptors. Do not ask them to fill in 12 rubrics per student.

  5. Host a 30-minute parent orientation at the start of term — either in-person or as a recorded video — that walks through the new format section by section. Schools that run this report far fewer "what does this mean?" calls and PTM conversations.

  6. Review after one term. What are parents asking about most? What sections are being ignored? Iterate.

For school leaders planning to implement this at scale, see how schools work with Reportify for more on technology, training, and rollout support.


Bringing It All Together

Indian parents in 2026 are not asking schools to abandon marks. They are asking for a report card that shows whether their child is genuinely learning, growing socially, and building skills for life — and what the school wants them to do about it. NEP 2020 and NCF 2023 have provided the policy mandate. PARAKH's HPC templates have provided the official format. What remains is implementation: translating good policy into a one-page document a parent can read on a phone in three minutes and walk into a PTM prepared to have a real conversation.


Try the Skill Analyser — simulate your students' CSD Scores based on real events from your school: /simulator

See how schools implement Reportify — full walkthrough for school administrators: /schools

Book a Demo — speak with the Reportify team about your specific context: /contact


Frequently asked questions

Will a holistic report card still show marks and percentages?
NEP 2020 and PARAKH do not eliminate marks — they require schools to go beyond marks-only evaluation. Most schools will continue to show marks or grade descriptors alongside competency-level indicators, socio-emotional ratings, and co-curricular skill evidence. The goal is a fuller picture, not the removal of academic data.
How does a parent know if their child is at, above, or below grade level?
A well-designed 2026 report card should clearly state whether a student is meeting, approaching, or exceeding grade-level learning outcomes per subject — not just report a percentage. NCF 2023 assessment guidelines explicitly require competency descriptors rather than raw scores alone. Schools can add one-line plain-English summaries per subject to make this immediately readable.
Why is there so much emphasis on co-curricular activities on the new report card?
NEP 2020 and NCF 2023 define education as nurturing cognitive, socio-emotional, physical, artistic, and ethical development — not exam performance alone. PARAKH's Holistic Progress Cards include arts, sports, and club participation as evidence of skills like Teamwork, Leadership, Creativity, and Empathy. The shift reflects what research and Indian parents both say they value beyond marks.
How should a parent read a holistic report card if they are used to percentages and ranks?
Schools should design the first page as a snapshot: overall academic level, key strengths, and two to three focus areas. Parents mainly want to know if their child is progressing, if there are any concerns, and what they can do at home. Detailed rubrics and event logs can sit in later pages or behind a QR link for those who want them. A short parent orientation at the start of term significantly reduces confusion.
Will removing ranks harm a child's chances in board exams or admissions?
Holistic Progress Cards are designed to reduce unhealthy exam pressure and build deeper conceptual understanding, which can indirectly support performance. However, Class 10 and 12 board exams remain significant selection tools and HPCs are not yet used in college admissions. Schools should be honest with parents about this: holistic cards improve communication and feedback loops, not board results overnight.
What about schools in smaller towns or without access to national competitions — can they show strong holistic development?
Yes. Reportify's CSD framework is calibrated so that students who participate in 5–6 diverse intra-school events across different categories can reach a CSD Score of 4.5 or above — without needing state-level or national-level competition access. This is a deliberate equity design: holistic development should be visible and credible for students in rural and semi-urban schools, not just metro schools with large extracurricular budgets.

Related reading